The Belief of a God
Religion’s initial purpose, I believe, was to worship something greater than one’s self. Not to create excuses as to why one does something, not to explain the unexplainable and not to suppress fear. These are concepts, dealings and the creatings of man. It can, of course, be used to do the previously mentioned, but, again, that is but human nature, not religion itself. I cannot claim to say I know when the first religion was, nor can I prove or disprove the existence of God, but, I can say that ridding one’s self of fear and ignorance fits into the concept of self-preservation; which is, undoubtedly, a trait of man.
Using God to explain things one doesn’t know about is something of a natural inclination. Why does the sun rise in the day and set in the night? Because Helios is constantly riding his flaming chariot across the skies. Easy enough, and believable to one who truly accepts the concept of various, differentiating gods, but does disproving this by saying, “No. The Earth revolves around the sun while turning on it’s own axis, and when an area doesn’t face the sun, then night occurs.” disprove anything but the previously believed method in which a god causes night and day?
When does the existence of higher being prevent man from reaching out and attempting to fathom greater concepts, expand intellectually and understand the rules of the universe? Why do so many have to bicker as if the two are opposites; as if one prevents the other?
Science constantly tries to disprove God, as if it were a disprovable concept. Religion constantly tries to disregard viable sciences, as if it’s disregarding was a sensible thing to do. This, I believe, is a very substantial cause of the perpetual conflict between them. A large difference between the two, though, is the ways in which each side attempts to discredit and degrade the other. In science’s case, many who believe in God have faith in science, only because it allows them to further understand the world around them, and, who wouldn’t want such a thing? Yet, many people who believe in science completely disregard the existence of a God. I’ve heard so many renowned scientists be so obviously hypocritical in their attempts at ridding people of the concept of God, and babble idiotic clips of self-defeating logic as if it were a proven fact; or anything other than nonsense.
In religion’s case, not so much now as in the past, scientific discoveries, theories, things that have generally bettered the life of mankind as a whole and things which have only given us more clarity in the understanding of the world we live in have been smeared. This happened especially when the Catholic church took over. Great scientists were prosecuted; scientists who weren’t even as radical in their thought against the church as today’s, no one tried to disprove or denounce God, but, theories such as the Earth revolving around the Sun were smited by the church.
What very much instigated the conflict between religion and science was actually this period of time. Science, as religion, has been twisted into an intellectual weapon. It was never a concept meant to do anything but further expand our knowledge of the universe. Yet, the church’s prosecution of science could only instill a festering hatred; and, it is in the nature of man to want revenge. To want to do to his enemies as his enemies have done to him. What better way to degrade the church than to base a whole, well believed concept around disproving the core of religion’s concept?
Now, most religion seems to be used as many things, but, I don’t see many as worshiping God. Everything from controlling man to excusing him from morally wrong actions. It’s devolved to man’s ideals, man’s concepts and man’s corruption. If you do not follow this man’s interpretation of God and it’s rules, then you go to hell. This completely defeats the purpose of Religion, and, instead, builds up a completely opposite ideal; to worship what man has put in front of you. Religion, now, is not a religion, upholding or praising of God, but a religion of man.



3 comments
Right on.
My thoughts are that religion and science have a lot more in common than either side wants to accept. I think they are very much intertwined.
I agree that today the actual worship for the sake of simple worship and not due to fear or the need to conform…and that worship of whatever entity you choose rarely actually occurs.
Today’s society has placed god in “Superhero” mode. People call apon their higher power of choice to fix everything for them and then when something happens instead of looking at the negative aspects of life in a logical way, they blame said power for everything that is wrong. Society places all of their responsibilities on God’s head…instead of holding themselves accountable for their own actions and life choices.
“Science constantly tries to disprove God, as if it were a disprovable concept.”
Er, no, it does not.
I am saddened that you think it does. Such a misconception could certainly make one hostile to science, and that would be a shame.
“Now, most religion seems to be used as many things, but, I don’t see many as worshiping God. Everything from controlling man to excusing him from morally wrong actions.”
Your so right.
O’ and fffish science and religion have been trying to disprove one another for a long time. Yet religion just turns it’s back and says that scientist are all quacks. While scientist continue to say that man was not created by any god.
I personally believe that anyone who believes in talking snakes should be thrown in a loony-bin.
In the end i think a religious person will destroy us all.
One day he will think god wants him to end the world and he will try to do so to the best of his abilities. Like becoming a general or higher ranking and shooting of nuclear weapons.
And that man will be happy that he just killed everyone in the world cause he thinks he’s going to go to heaven.
Leave a Comment